Claude Codepasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+claude-code-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/26/2026.claude/skills/method-cohesion-diagnosticRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
Real Skill packageSource verifiedClawHub registry
method-cohesion-diagnostic
诊断心理学论文Method部分的衔接与连贯问题，检查时序衔接、段落过渡、模块连贯性，输出评分与顶刊正例参考
Identity and source
Publisher attributionwangjinhongmy-pixelregistry owner unverified by skillvetai
Functional categoryAwaiting category reviewreview pending · 0% rule confidence
Package forminstruction bundle41 recorded files
Canonical sourceClawHub registryclawhub:wangjinhongmy-pixel:method-cohesion-diagnostic
Platform declarations
These states come from the source or distribution context. None of the entries below are SkillVetAI compatibility test results.
OpenClawnative officialProvenance: registry distribution
Independent structural checks
These checks parse the fixed package against dated platform rules. They do not execute the Skill or verify task behavior.
OpenAI Codexpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+codex-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/26/2026.agents/skills/method-cohesion-diagnosticRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
OpenClawpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+openclaw-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/26/2026skills/method-cohesion-diagnosticRuntime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.
Installation and inspection
This command is recorded from the source ecosystem and resolves the registry's latest release. The fixed release shown on this page should be inspected before adoption.
clawhub install @wangjinhongmy-pixel/method-cohesion-diagnosticclawhub inspect @wangjinhongmy-pixel/method-cohesion-diagnostic --version 1.0.0Security evidence
SkillVetAI static result: no findings detected
This automated, non-executing scan is bound to this release hash. It is not a safety certification and may contain false positives or false negatives.
- Status
- completed
- Coverage
- partial text content
- Files
- 40 / 41 inspected as text
- Checked
- 8/26/2026, 1:23:14 PM
- Scanner
- 0.1.3
- Policy
- 1.0.3
2 inferred permission indicators
- network access — automatically inferred
- filesystem write — automatically inferred
4 dependency and API indicators
- api: doi.org
- api: dx.doi.org
- api: osf.io
- api: psychvault.org
External clawhub result: clean
This is registry-supplied evidence for the recorded release, not an independent SkillVetAI scan. Check the canonical source for the full report, scanner versions, scope, and current moderation state.
- Evidence checked
- 8/26/2026, 2:44:09 AM
- Release binding
- Matches this record
- vt: clean
- skillspector: clean
- llm: clean
Recorded files
The catalog stores hashes and an inventory summary for change detection. It does not republish the package contents.
Package content hash
sha256:5a81264a907d2c3a06691a4e17d097f6169ae39c8ac6074f2dc60e00d5563e99Show up to 30 recorded paths
references/checklist.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Abramson_2024_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Altgassen_2025_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Asaba_2025_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Benitez-Agudelo_2025_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Buttner_2024_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Carpenter_2019_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Damian_2018_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Diaz-Guerra_2026_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Entringer_2026_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Gaesser_2019_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Gao_2025_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Georgeac_2022_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Haider_2022_6.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Kardas_2021_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Kteily_2016_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Landis_2022_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Le_2024_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Logg_2018_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_March_2021_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_McLean_2019_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Micheli_2023_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Olaru_2023_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Park_2019_6.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Petsko_2022_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Phillips_2021_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Rudert_2023_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Thiele_2025_4.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Thielmann_2025_5.mdreferences/examples/cohesion_Urban_2024_4.md
Source changelog
Initial release of the "method-cohesion-diagnostic" skill for psychology academic writing. - Diagnoses cohesion and coherence issues in the Method section of psychology papers, focusing on sequence accuracy, paragraph transitions, inter-module logic, and referential clarity. - Applies comprehensive criteria from *Science Research Writing* (2nd ed.), Unit 2 §2.4.2 and the Generic Methods Model. - Utilizes a 117-item checklist, detailed scoring rubric (A/B/C/D/F), and top-tier journal exemplars as diagnostic references. - Outputs clear scores and provides specific examples of best practices for sequence language, transitions, logical flow, and reference usage. - Designed for integration with related diagnostics on structure, logic, grammar, and vocabulary.