Real Skill packageSource verifiedClawHub registry

code-review

Review code on two axes — Standards (code quality) and Spec (requirements alignment). Supports multi-agent parallel review, visual review, and file-based handoffs.

Identity and source

Publisher attributionpaudyyinregistry owner unverified by skillvetai
Functional categorySupport, Ecommerce & Customer Opsautomatically inferred · 57% rule confidence
Package forminstruction with code13 recorded files
Canonical sourceClawHub registryclawhub:paudyyin:code-review
Open canonical source ↗

Platform declarations

These states come from the source or distribution context. None of the entries below are SkillVetAI compatibility test results.

OpenClawnative officialProvenance: registry distribution

Independent structural checks

These checks parse the fixed package against dated platform rules. They do not execute the Skill or verify task behavior.

Claude Codepasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+claude-code-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/13/2026.claude/skills/code-review

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

OpenAI Codexpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+codex-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/13/2026.agents/skills/code-review

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

OpenClawpasses structure
Checker 0.1.0 · agent-skills-2026-08-13+openclaw-docs-2026-08-13 · 8/13/2026skills/code-review

Runtime, accounts, dependencies, permissions, network behavior and task quality remain untested.

Installation and inspection

This command is recorded from the source ecosystem and resolves the registry's latest release. The fixed release shown on this page should be inspected before adoption.

clawhub install @paudyyin/code-review
clawhub inspect @paudyyin/code-review --version 2.2.0

Security evidence

SkillVetAI static result: high signal

This automated, non-executing scan is bound to this release hash. It is not a safety certification and may contain false positives or false negatives.

Status
completed
Coverage
full text content
Files
13 / 13 inspected as text
Checked
8/13/2026, 7:30:35 PM
Scanner
0.1.3
Policy
1.0.3
1 automated finding
highDynamic code or shell execution is presentreferences/confidence-scoring.md:106 · confidence 78%eval(
1 High/Critical review queue entry
STATIC_DYNAMIC_CODE_EXECUTIONpending
Open human review queue →
5 inferred permission indicators
  • shell execution — automatically inferred
  • network access — automatically inferred
  • filesystem read — automatically inferred
  • filesystem write — automatically inferred
  • credential access — automatically inferred
2 dependency and API indicators
  • api: clawhub.ai
  • api: github.com
External clawhub result: suspicious

This is registry-supplied evidence for the recorded release, not an independent SkillVetAI scan. Check the canonical source for the full report, scanner versions, scope, and current moderation state.

Evidence checked
8/3/2026, 1:07:51 AM
Release binding
Matches this record
  • skillspector: suspicious
  • llm: suspicious

Recorded files

The catalog stores hashes and an inventory summary for change detection. It does not republish the package contents.

Package content hashsha256:402134e5f61291db949569a3bbbe923e1c3c3b0495db937b6f66067a453e6858
Show up to 13 recorded paths
  • references/confidence-scoring.md
  • scripts/annotation_store.py
  • scripts/diff_parser.py
  • scripts/diff_renderer.py
  • scripts/import_analyzer.py
  • scripts/report_generator.py
  • scripts/test_import_analyzer.py
  • scripts/visual_review.py
  • skill-card.md
  • SKILL.md
  • templates/branch-reviewer-prompt.md
  • templates/impact-report.md
  • templates/task-reviewer-prompt.md

Source changelog

- Introduced a dual-axis review architecture, separating code quality (Standards) and requirements alignment (Spec) into isolated review phases. - Added detailed frameworks for both axes: Fowler’s 12 code smells and project-specific coding standards for Standards, and structured requirement mapping (Missing/Extra/Misunderstood/Edge/Non-functional) for Spec. - Implemented strict serial isolation between review phases to prevent context contamination and increase traceability. - Enhanced review outputs with standardized report templates for both axes and clarified the decision rules for final approvals. - Updated multi-stage review process, with task-level and branch-level review mechanisms, and integrated automatic change impact analysis between review stages. - Improved file-based handoff standards and clarified multi-agent, parallel, and visual review support.